Loading stock data...

FTC Takes Action Against Neobank Dave Over Misleading Marketing and Hidden Fees

FTC Takes Action Against Dave, Alleging Misleading Marketing and Dark Patterns

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has announced that it will be taking action against the online cash app and neobank Dave, alleging that the company used "misleading marketing to deceive consumers." The FTC claims that Dave marketed $500 cash advances to consumers, but rarely offered them. Additionally, the agency alleges that Dave charged a "Express Fee" if customers wanted their money immediately.

Misleading Marketing Practices

The FTC’s complaint states that Dave’s marketing practices were misleading because they implied that cash advances would be instant and available on the spot. However, this was not always the case. According to the complaint, consumers were often told that they could get their money quickly, but in reality, the process took several days.

The FTC also alleges that Dave used a tactic called "dark patterns" to deceive customers. Dark patterns are manipulative design practices used by companies to guide users into taking actions that benefit the company’s goals, rather than the consumer’s interests. In this case, the complaint states that Dave designed its user interface to make it difficult for consumers to detect or avoid the Express Fee.

The Impact of Dark Patterns

Dark patterns have become a significant issue in the tech industry. A recent study by the FTC found that a majority of subscription apps and websites use dark patterns to trick consumers into paying more than they intended. The study showed that companies often use tactics such as automatically checking boxes when users sign up, or showing larger buttons for actions that benefit the company.

In Dave’s case, the complaint states that the company used images of a cartoon child surrounded by food and messaging that implied that tips would go to providing meals for people in need. However, according to the FTC, only 10 cents of each "tip" is donated to charity, while the remaining amount goes to Dave.

The Surprise Fee

One of the most egregious practices allegedly used by Dave was the surprise fee, which the company described as a "tip." The complaint states that this fee was not always disclosed until after consumers completed the sign-up process and gave Dave access to their bank account. When consumers tried to lower or cancel the tip, they were presented with images of the food being taken away from the child.

Revenue Generated by Tips

According to SEC filings, Dave generated over $149 million in revenue from tips between 2022 and the first six months of 2024. The FTC is seeking an injunction to stop Dave from continuing its behavior and may also seek a monetary award or other relief as deemed by the court.

Dave’s Response

In response to the complaint, Dave stated that it was "disappointed" that the FTC had chosen to file suit. The company claimed that many of the FTC’s allegations were incorrect and that it had always acted within the law.

"We take compliance and customer transparency very seriously and believe that we have always acted within the law," a company statement read. "We remain focused on serving our members who love and rely on our products."

The Importance of Transparency

This case highlights the importance of transparency in business practices, particularly when it comes to financial services. Consumers have the right to know what they are getting into and what fees they will be charged.

As technology continues to evolve, companies must ensure that their marketing practices are honest and transparent. The use of dark patterns is a clear example of how companies can take advantage of consumers by hiding fees or using manipulative design practices.

Conclusion

The FTC’s action against Dave serves as a reminder to companies in the financial services industry to prioritize transparency and honesty in their marketing practices. Consumers deserve to know what they are getting into and what fees they will be charged.

In this case, the use of dark patterns and surprise fees has led to significant revenue for Dave, but at what cost? The FTC’s action against the company highlights the importance of holding companies accountable for their business practices.

Related News

  • How to Turn Off Apple Intelligence-Powered Notification Summaries: In related news, a recent article on TechCrunch discussed how to turn off Apple’s Intelligence-powered notification summaries.
  • Open Source Licenses: Everything You Need to Know: Another article on TechCrunch explored the world of open source licenses and what companies need to know about them.

Subscribe for More Industry News

Stay up-to-date with the latest news in the tech industry by subscribing to TechCrunch’s newsletters. From AI to space, we cover it all.

Related Post